Controlling the contributions to high-order harmonic generation from different nuclei of N2 with an orthogonally polarized two-color laser field
Du Hui, Pan Xue-Fei, Liu Hai-Feng, Zhang Hong-Dan, Zhang Jun, Guo Jing, Liu Xue-Shen†,
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: liuxs@jlu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11271158, 61575077, and 11574117).

Abstract
Abstract

The generation of high-order harmonic and the attosecond pulse of the N2 molecule with an orthogonally polarized two-color laser field are investigated by the strong-field Lewenstein model. We show that the control of contributions to high-order harmonic generation (HHG) from different nuclei is realized by properly selecting the relative phase. When the relative phase is chosen to be φ = 0.4π, the contribution to HHG from one nucleus is much more than that from another. Interference between two nuclei can be suppressed greatly; a supercontinuum spectrum of HHG appears from 40 eV to 125 eV. The underlying physical mechanism is well explained by the time–frequency analysis and the semi-classical three-step model with a finite initial transverse velocity. By superposing several orders of harmonics, an isolated attosecond pulse with a duration of 80 as can be generated.

1. Introduction

With the fast development of femtosecond laser technology, recent years have witnessed great success both in research and application of high-order harmonic generation (HHG).[14] High-order harmonic radiation has been a powerful tool to generate attosecond pulses[58] and coherent soft x-ray source,[9] to probe ultrafast electronic dynamics,[10,11] and to reveal structures of molecular orbitals.[12,13] The basic understanding of the formation for attosecond pulse train in HHG has been provided by a semi-classical three-step model.[1416] An electron in an atom is ionized by tunneling through the effective potential barrier, then it oscillates freely under the drive of the electronic field, and after sign reversal of the field, it may recollide with its parent ion, emitting a harmonic photon simultaneously whose energy corresponds to the sum of ionization energy and the kinetic energy of the electron.

In recent decades, a lot of advanced techniques have been proposed to generate an isolated attosecond pulse both in experiment and theory, such as few-cycle laser pulses,[17,18] two-color field,[19,20] and polarization gating.[2123] As a kind of polarization gating scheme, the orthogonally polarized two-color (OPTC) laser fields by superimposing a driving field and its orthogonally polarized second harmonic have been proposed as a simple yet effective approach to steer the electronic dynamics.[2427] Kim et al.[28,29] proposed an efficient method to control the quantum path by appropriately changing the relative phase of the OPTC laser field, leading to a continuous HHG spectrum and a regular attosecond pulse. It has been demonstrated that correlated electron dynamics are sensitively dependent on the relative phase of the OPTC laser field in nonsequential double ionization (NSDI) and realized the control of electrons recollision as well as emission in space and time with sub-laser-cycle and attosecond precision.[30,31] Xie[32] proposed a two-dimensional interferometry based on the electron wave-packet interference by using a cycle-shaped OPTC laser field, in which different types of interferences can be easily disentangled into different directions in the measured 2D photoelectron momentum spectrum. A powerful scheme with phase-controlled OPTC laser fields has also been proposed experimentally to control the interference between electron wave packets released at different times.[33] Moreover, the effect of electron diffraction[34] and the image of atomic and molecular orbital features by the measurements of HHG spectra[35,36] were also reported with such pulses.

In this paper, we theoretically investigate the HHG of the N2 molecule in an OPTC laser field by the strong-field Lewenstein model. We find that the control of contributions to harmonic radiation from different nuclei is realized by properly selecting the relative phase. The interference between two nuclei can be suppressed greatly by enhancing contribution from one nucleus and inhibiting contribution from another nucleus, which is very beneficial to generate a clean and regular harmonic spectrum. As a result, an isolated attosecond pulse with a bandwidth of 80 as can be generated directly by the superposition of the supercontinuum harmonics.

2. Model

We demonstrate the generation of high-order harmonic and the attosecond pulse of N2 molecules by the strong-field Lewenstein model.[14,21,37] The transition amplitude for HHG can be calculated by the integral

The transition amplitude contains the information of HHG which is in good agreement with the semi-classical three-step model: dion[pst(t, τ) − A(tτ)]E(tτ), depicts the progress of electrons emitted from ground state to the continuous state; exp[−iS(pst,t, τ)] represents the motion of the freed electrons without the interaction of Coulomb potential; drec[pst(t, τ) − A(t)] is the transition dipole of the freed electrons turning back to the ion parent. ɛ is a positive regularization constant, τ is the traveling time of free electron between ionization and recombination. E(t) is the electric field of the laser pulse and A(t) is the associated vector potential. pst(t, τ) is the stationary momentum obtained by the stationary points integral algorithm. S(pst,t, τ) is the quasi-classical action of the electron.

It has been demonstrated that the quasi-classical action S(pst,t, τ) has been considered in the molecular structure information,[38] which incorporates four possible recombination scenarios as shown in Fig. 1, where C1 and C2 are the nuclei of N2 molecule and R is the inter-nuclear distance. Figure 1 shows that the electron leaves and returns to the same nucleus, or the electron is emitted from a nucleus and recombines with another nucleus.[38] Since the HHG mainly depends on the progress of recombination, one may distinguish two main scenarios: the progress of an ionized electron that recombines with the nucleus C1 and the progress of an ionized electron that recombines with the nucleus C2. On this basis, we investigate the contributions to HHG from two nuclei of N2 molecule, respectively, to illustrate the characteristics of the harmonic spectrums.

Fig. 1. Four possible recombination scenarios of the ionized electron that returns to the parent ion. C1 and C2 are the nuclei of N2 molecule.

We investigate the HHG of N2 molecule by an OPTC laser field, in which the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) constructed by the GAMESS-UK package[39,40] is taken into account. The transition amplitude can be calculated along the x and y directions

where Ex(t) and Ey(t) are the x and y components of the OPTC laser field, and pst(t, τ) is the stationary momentum obtained by the stationary points integral algorithm. The quasi-classical action S(pst,t, τ) at the stationary points can be calculated by

The harmonic spectrum intensity is obtained by Fourier transforming the time-dependent dipole acceleration

The temporal profile of an attosecond pulse can be obtained by superposing several harmonics in x and y directions as follows:

where aqx = ∫ x(t)e−iqωt dt and aqy = ∫ y(t)e−iqωt dt, and q is the harmonic order.

It is known that electrons ionized without an initial transverse velocity will miss the parent ion in the elliptical polarization laser field and a semi-classical three-step model with a proper initial transverse velocity is introduced in our paper to explain the underlying mechanism of the progress of HHG, in which the transverse displacement caused by the external field is compensated by an initial transverse velocity.[41,42]

3. Numerical results

We demonstrate the contributions to the high-harmonic yield from different nuclei of N2 molecule in an OPTC laser field, which is composed of a 400-nm linearly polarized field along the x axis and a 800-nm linearly polarized field along the y axis. The synthesized field can be expressed as

The peak intensities E0 of the two pulses are equal, which is chosen as 7 × 1014 W/cm2. The carrier frequency ω1 = 0.1138 a.u. (400 nm in wavelength) and ω2 = 0.0569 a.u. (800 nm in wavelength). τ = 3 fs is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the laser field. x and y are the polarization vectors. φ is the relative phase between the two components.

Figure 2(a) shows the electric field of the OPTC laser field (black solid line) with φ = 0. The green dashed line is the linearly polarized 400-nm field along the x axis and the blue dotted line is the linearly polarized 800-nm field along the y axis. The ionized electron is driven by the electronic force in both x and y directions so that the motion along the x axis is mainly affected by the linearly polarized 400-nm field and the motion along the y axis is mainly affected by the linearly polarized 800-nm field, respectively. Figure 2(b) shows the high-order harmonic spectrum obtained by summing up the intensities of the x and y components in the OPTC laser field with a relative phase φ = 0. It shows that there is an irregular spectrum with a cut-off energy of about 165 eV. Moreover, the intensity of the spectrum between 107–122 eV shows an obvious subsidence and an interference minimum appears around 116 eV.

Fig. 2. (a) Electric field of the orthogonally polarized two-color laser field with a relative phase φ = 0; (b) harmonic spectrum obtained by summing up the intensities of the x and y components in the OPTC laser field with a relative phase φ = 0.

To explain the underlying mechanism of the HHG, we illustrate the emission time of the harmonics in terms of the time–frequency analysis of the dipole acceleration along the x and y directions, which is shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), respectively. It is shown that the emission peaks in both directions are similar and the intensity of the emission peaks in the y direction is a little stronger than that in the x direction, thus we only demonstrate the HHG progress along the y direction for convenience if not explicitly stated. Figure 3(b) shows that there are three emission peaks marked as A, B, and C. There are two quantum paths for each emission peak: the quantum path with earlier ionization time but later emission time is the long path, and the other path with later ionization time but earlier emission time is the short path. The maximum kinetic energy of the emission peak B located around 0.2 O.C. reaches 165 eV, which corresponds to the cut-off energy of the spectrum shown in Fig. 2(a). Due to the higher intensities, emission peaks B and C make a major contribution to HHG, of which the short paths are suppressed and the long paths are selected. Figure 3(c) shows the dependence of the energy on the ionization and emission times by the semi-classical three-step model with a finite initial transverse velocity. This indicates that the electrons are mainly ionized around −1 O.C., −0.4 O.C., 0.1 O.C., and the electron recombination takes place around peak A′, B′, and C′, which corresponds to the emission peaks A, B, and C shown in Fig. 3(b). The electrons are ionized at around −0.4 O.C. and return at around 0.2 O.C. with the maximum energy of 165 eV. Figure 3(d) shows the electron trajectories with finite initial transverse velocities, which depicts that the freed electrons are driven by the electronic field and finally move back to the origin.

Fig. 3. Time–frequency distribution of the harmonics along (a) the x and (b) y directions; (c) dependence of energy on the ionization (solid blue triangles) and emission times (solid green circles) in the OPTC laser field with a relative phase φ = 0; (d) the corresponding electron trajectories with finite initial transverse velocities.

Figure 4 shows the Lissajous diagrams of OPTC laser field with different relative phases varying from 0 to π by an interval of π/8, which indicates the trajectories of the electronic field vectors in one optical cycle. In the case of φ = 0, figure 4(a) shows that the trajectory of the electronic field vector shows a periodic oscillation and the electronic field of two components reaches the peaks simultaneously, resulting in the matched motions along x and y directions. One can see that the two components cannot pass through zero at the same time. In other words, when an ionized electron is driven across zero point along the x direction, the motion along the y direction cannot return to the nucleus region; therefore the ionized electron has to experience much more time for recollision, which corresponds to the long path of the trajectory. Thus, in the case of φ = 0, the long path is selected and short path is suppressed as discussed in Fig. 3(b).

Fig. 4. Lissajous diagrams of OPTC laser field with different relative phases φ varying from 0 to π by an interval of π/8. (a) φ = 0, (b) φ = 0.125π, (c) φ = 0.25π, (d) φ = 0.325π, (e) φ = 0.5π, (f) φ = 0.625π, (g) φ = 0.75π, (h) φ = 0.825π.

When the relative phase changes from 0 to 0.825π, Lissajous diagrams of OPTC laser field are shown in Figs. 3(b)3(h), which resemble a bow tie and become elongated or contracted trajectories. Especially in the case of φ = 0.5π, figure 4(e) shows that the two crossed linear regions appear around the origin, alternately reversing its direction every half an optical cycle. Although the motion along the x and y directions is not matched, the ionized electron can be driven back to the nucleus region along the x and y directions simultaneously. Just like the circumstance of the short path in one-color linearly polarized laser field, the electron emitted in the linear region can be captured directly by the nucleus after sign reversal of the field, which corresponds to the short path of the trajectory. Thus, in the case of φ = 0.5π, the short path is selected and long path is suppressed.

Figure 5 shows the HHG along the y direction when the electron recombines with the nuclei C1 and C2 in OPTC laser field with different relative phases, which can distinguish the contributions to HHG from different nuclei of the N2. The green solid line H1 shows the HHG when the electron recombines with the nucleus C1 and the blue dashed line H2 shows the HHG when the electron recombines with the nucleus C2, respectively. For φ = 0, figure 5(a) shows that the contribution to HHG from the nucleus C1 is a little smaller than that from the nucleus C2. With increasing value of relative phase, figures 5(b)5(d) show that the intensity of spectrum generated by electrons recombined with the nucleus C1 is gradually enhanced while the contribution to HHG from C2 is suppressed. This may provide very good enlightenment that the interference between two nuclei can be suppressed by enhancing contribution of one nucleus and inhibiting the contribution of another nucleus, which is very beneficial to generate a clean and regular harmonic spectrum.

Fig. 5. High-order harmonic generation when the electron recombines with different nuclei of N2 molecule along the y direction in the OPTC laser field with different relative phases (a) φ = 0, (b) φ = 0.3π, (c) φ = 0.4π, (d) φ = 0.5π. The green solid line H1 shows the HHG when the electron recombines with the nucleus C1 and the blue dashed line H2 shows the HHG when the electron recombines with the nucleus C2, respectively.

We demonstrate the time–frequency distributions of the high-harmonic spectrum along the y direction when the electron recombines with the nucleus C1 in Figs. 6(a)6(d) and the nucleus C2 in Figs. 6(e)6(h) of N2 molecule in OPTC laser field with different relative phases of φ = 0, φ = 0.3π, φ = 0.4π, and φ = 0.5π, respectively. For the case of φ = 0, figures 6(a) and 6(e) show that the intensity of emission peaks contributed by the electron recombined with the nucleus C1 is a little smaller than that with the nucleus C2. For the case of φ = 0.3π, figures 6(b) and 6(f) show that the intensity of emission peaks contributed by the electron recombined with the nucleus C2 is suppressed and the emission peaks contributed by the electron recombined with the nucleus C1 dominate the major contribution. For cases of φ = 0.4π and φ = 0.5π, a similar phenomenon can be observed. From Fig. 6 we can see that, with the increase in the phases, the short path is selected and the long path is suppressed, which is in good agreement with the discussion of Fig. 4.

Fig. 6. Time–frequency distributions of the high-harmonic spectrum along the y direction when the electron recombines with the nucleus C1 (a)–(d) and the nucleus C2 (e)–(h) of N2 molecule in the OPTC laser field with different relative phases φ = 0, φ = 0.3π, φ = 0.4π, and φ = 0.5π, respectively.

We know that the interference between two nuclei can be suppressed by enhancing the contribution of one nucleus and inhibiting the contribution of another nucleus. In Fig. 7, we show that a smooth and strong harmonic spectrum is obtained by summing up the intensities of the x and y components with φ = 0.4π. We can see that a continuum spectrum can be achieved from 40 eV to 125 eV. The comparison of the spectrums between 40–140 eV for φ = 0 and φ = 0.4π is presented in the inset of Fig. 7, which shows that the intensity of the spectrum for φ = 0.4π is greatly enhanced compared to that for φ = 0, and the subsidence of spectrum plateau as well as the interference minimum are absent.

Fig. 7. Harmonic spectrum obtained by summing up the intensities of the x and y components in the OPTC laser field with φ = 0.4π. The inset shows the comparison of the spectrums between 40–140 eV generated by the OPTC laser field with φ = 0 (red solid line) and φ = 0.4π (blue dashed line).

Figure 8 shows the temporal profiles of the attosecond pulses generated by superposing several bandwidths of the harmonics of the spectrums for the relative phases φ = 0 and φ = 0.4π. For the case of φ = 0, the temporal profile of the selected shortest attosecond pulse with the duration of 147 as is shown in Fig. 8(a) by superposing the harmonics from 120 eV–160 eV. For the case of φ = 0.4π, the plateau structure is a supercontinuum spectrum with less modulation. Thus, an isolated attosecond pulse can be generated by superposing any range of the harmonic spectrum. By superposing the harmonics in the range of 68 eV–106 eV, an isolated attosecond pulse with the duration of about 80 as is generated as shown in Fig. 8(b).

Fig. 8. Temporal profiles of the attosecond pulses generated by superposing the harmonics for the relative phase (a) φ = 0 and (b) φ = 0.4π.
4. Conclusions

We theoretically investigate the generation of high-order harmonic and attosecond pulse of the N2 molecule in an orthogonally polarized two-color laser field by the strong-field Lewenstein model. By properly selecting the relative phase, the control of contributions to HHG from different nuclei of the N2 is realized and a smooth and strong harmonic spectrum is obtained with φ = 0.4π. A continuum spectrum can be achieved from 40 eV to 125 eV and the subsidence of spectrum plateau as well as the interference minimum is absent. The time–frequency analysis and the semi-classical three-step model with a finite initial transverse velocity are used to illustrate the physical mechanism of the HHG. By superposing several bandwidths of harmonic spectrum, an isolated 80-as pulse can be generated directly.

Reference
1Le A TWei HJin CLin C D 2016 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49 053001
2Zhong S YHe X KTeng HYe PWang L FHe PWei Z Y 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 023301
3Zhang JDu HLiu H FGuo JLiu X S 2016 Opt. Commun. 366 457
4Milošević D B 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 043827
5Wu JZhang G TXia C LLiu X S 2010 Phys. Rev. 82 013411
6Ge X LDu HWang QGuo JLiu X S 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 023201
7Cao XJiang SYu CWang YBai LLu R 2014 Opt. Express 22 26153
8Du HWang HHu B 2010 Phys. Rev. 81 063813
9Bartels R APaul AGreen Het al.2002Science297376
10Maurer JDimitrovski DChristensen LMadsen L BStapelfeldt H 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 123001
11Goulielmakis ELoh Z HWirth Aet al. 2010 Nature 466 739
12Zhang C PMiao X Y 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 043302
13Zhang BYuan JZhao Z 2014 Phys. Rev. 90 035402
14Lewenstein MBalcou PIvanov M YL’Huillier ACorkum P B 1994 Phys. Rev. 49 2117
15Corkum P B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994
16Schafer K JYang BDiMauro L FKulander K C 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1599
17Goulielmakis ESchultze MHofstetter Met al. 2008 Science 320 1614
18Christov I PMurnane M MKapteyn H C 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1251
19Feng LChu T 2011 Phys. Rev. 84 053853
20Li P CLaughlin CChu S I 2014 Phys. Rev. 89 023431
21Chang Z 2005 Phys. Rev. 71 023813
22Yuan K JBandrauk A D 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 063401
23Jiao Z HWang G LLi P CZhou X X 2014 Phys. Rev. 90 025401
24Zheng YDiao HZeng ZGe XLi RXu Z 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 033417
25Brugnera LHoffmann D JSiegel TFrank FZaïr ATisch J W GMarangos J P 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 153902
26Zhang LXie XRoither SKartashov Det al. 2014 Phys. Rev. 90 061401(R)
27Yuan ZYe DXia QLiu JFu L 2015 Phys. Rev. 91 063417
28Kim C MKim I JNam C H 2005 Phys. Rev. 72 033817
29Kim C MNam C H 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 3199
30Chen LZhou YHuang CZhang QLu P 2013 Phys. Rev. 88 043425
31Zhang LXie XRoither Set al. 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 193002
32Xie X 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 173003
33Richter MKunitski MSchöffler Met al. 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 143001
34Murray RRuiz CMarangos J PIvanov M Y 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 135601
35Shafir DMairesse YVilleneuve D MCorkum P BDudovich N 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 412
36Niikura HDudovich NVilleneuve D MCorkum P B 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 053003
37Priori ECerullo GNisoli Met al. 2000 Phys. Rev. 61 063801
38Figueira de Morisson Faria C 2009 Laser Phys. 19 797
39GAMESS-UK is a package of ab initio programs (see http://www.cfs.dl.ac.uk/gamess-uk/index.shtml)
40Guest M FBush I JVan Dam H J Jet al. 2005 J. Mol. Phys. 103 719
41Sansone G 2009 Phys. Rev. 79 053410
42Möller MCheng YKhan S Det al. 2012 Phys. Rev. 86 011401(R)